Re: XFS 2.4.3 patch

[Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:24:25PM +1000, Robin Humble wrote:
> Secondary:
> Working 3c905b is the next most important thing... is this broken in
> 2.4.2 (as reported on this list) and fixed in 2.4.3 do you think?
> We're getting problems with dual 3c905b's... I thought it was IRQ
> issues, but we tried workarounds for that - maybe it's the 2.4.2 kernel?
> 
> cheers,
> robin

>From my limited amount of testing, the 3c59x module seems to be more stable.
Earlier, I would get errors from the module when the machine was stressed;
now this is not the case.

Ajay