| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux 2.4.4 |
| From: | gcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:13:24 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20010428230127.A1753@gruyere.muc.suse.de>; from ak@suse.de on SZO, ÁPR 28, 2001 at 11:01:27 +0200 |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010428140403.04271ec0@pop.xs4all.nl> <3AEAE40A.8E940486@thebarn.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010428221754.04278bd8@pop.xs4all.nl> <20010428230127.A1753@gruyere.muc.suse.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.17i |
Hello, * Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> [010429 18:30]: > The D state problems should be fixed by the new rwsem implementation. I hope. :-) > Of course 2.4 is still work in progress, if you want a stable kernel stay > with 2.2. Yes, ofcourse we know we have to pay for living on the bleeding edge. Anyway, is XFS backported to 2.2.x? If not, then it is not a good solution for me, as it means I can not access my /home partition any more, guess why. I think Russel said something that it is compiling. So, what are the experience with it? Will the CVS tree bumped to it somewhen? Thanks, Laszlo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Dumping a mounted filesystem, Chris Pascoe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.4, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux 2.4.4, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux 2.4.4, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |