xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: reproducible wedge/corruption

To: Ed McKenzie <eem12@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: reproducible wedge/corruption
From: Utz Lehmann <leh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 17:00:08 +0200
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, mjmac@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010405101640.B8437@eem12.resnet.cornell.edu>; from eem12@cornell.edu on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:16:40AM -0400
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010405100511.03b0d668@pop.xs4all.nl> <20010405101640.B8437@eem12.resnet.cornell.edu>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Ed McKenzie [eem12@xxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:07:27AM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
> > >Ok, script attached.
> > 
> > It passed the stress.sh here with flying colours.
> > Can't find anything wrong yet.
> > Have you tried it on both PowerEdges 350 or just one of them?
> 
> MeToo(tm): I left two instances running last night, with no lockups as
> far as I can tell.

MeToo too .-)

On my System at Home (K6-500, IBM IDE full optimised with hdparm (UDMA,
unmaskirq, ...)) the script passes without any errors.


utz

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>