xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available.

To: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available.
From: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:17:47 -0500
Cc: Linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103301443590.13729-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from jlb17@xxxxxxxx on Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:45:42PM -0500
Organization: Center for Document Analysis and Recognition
References: <20010330143542.G16131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103301443590.13729-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:45:42PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 at 2:35pm, Ajay Shekhawat wrote
> 
> > I've successfully patched the 2.4.3 kernel with these patches (almost 
> > everything
> > worked, except for a few minor  rejects).
> >
> > So far, it seems to be OK. NFS serving of XFS works, and I'm beating on it
> > heavily.
> >
> > The reason for the switch: I'd heard that the 3C905B ethernet card is better
> > supported in 2.4.3. I've been having problems with this card under a heavy
> > load; I just thought I'd try out the new kernel and see.
> 
> Are you running on any SMP machines?  I had to add the 'noapic' option to
> my server running the 2.4.2-xfs kernel, otherwise eth0 disappeared due to
> lost interrupts after very little activity.

Yes, it is an SMP system, with dual P-II 450MHz CPUs on an ASUS P2B-DS
motherboard.  I didn't have to use the "noapic" option, but maybe I should 
have tried that with my 2.4.2-xfs when I encountered the problems with 
the ethernet card... Oh well, lets see how this fares.

Ajay


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>