| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Module loading problems |
| From: | Danny <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:02:42 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Connex Inc |
| References: | <13262.985794727@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3AC23956.598060DA@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | dcox@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Russell,
Russell Cattelan wrote:
> But Keith is correct if your building custom kernels it's easier to just
> compile
> everything in.
And safer! During one testing phase, I almost locked myself out: the
xfs modules wouldn't load, and guess where the source was? On an XFS
fs! Whups! I've built it in from then on....
--
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick
themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."
-- Winston Churchill
Danny
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Unmount Didn't; Clues?, Danny |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | gcc 3.0 prerelease, Mario |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Module loading problems, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Module loading problems, Bryan-TheBS-Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |