xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kinda off topic

To: Tom Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kinda off topic
From: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 17:42:34 -0700 (MST)
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103251620570.19348-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cool.  I realize that a lot of people probably use the graphical login so
it doesn't even effect them, but since the xfs install by default includes
devfs it seems that it should work for everyone out-of-box.

On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Tom Duffy wrote:

> well, the final version of the iso should include some rpms we stick in
> the ProPack which fix some of these issues...namely sgi-extra and
> sgi-initscripts...
>
> -tduffy
>
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Russel Ingram wrote:
>
> > This is kinda off topic, but...
> >
> > Is there some way we can get an rpm with the correct setup in
> > /etc/security/console.perms so a normal user can use X?  I don't even know
> > what rpm that file is part of but its a simple enough thing that it seems
> > to me it would be an easy fix to make and include on the sgi iso as a
> > replacement for the RH rpm.
> >
> > Russ
> >
>
>

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Bill Gates and Microsoft have ruined the computer industry for
 a long time to come by creating a class of ignorant and lazy
 computer users."  --Russel Ingram

"Mommy ... can I go out and ... KILL TONIGHT!?"
                   --Glen  Danzig, The Misfits
---------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Ingram
Gargoyle Computer Consulting
(307)742-1361
www.gargoylecc.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>