| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Effect of kiobufs? |
| From: | "thomas graichen" <list-linux.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:26:27 +0200 |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | spoiled dot org |
| References: | <20010324131336.A3369@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010325165437.492F31C00A3D@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | "thomas graichen" <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Pan/0.9.1 (Unix) |
always make shure to at least use a testfilesize (-s option of bonnie) twice as big as your main memory to avoid cache effects t In article <20010325165437.492F31C00A3D@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dbl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Here is what I am seeing on the following system: > > Athlon 1GHZ Ultra2 LVD SCSI 10K RPM disk > 256MB Memory > > To be sure, I ran it several times. I used a package called bonnie to > get these numbers. > > - XFS mounted with default mount options > ---------Sequential Output---------- -- thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx> ... perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away. --- antoine de saint-exupery |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LOCKUP with XFS and NFS, Ajay Shekhawat |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LOCKUP with XFS and NFS, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Effect of kiobufs?, Dave Lounsberry |
| Next by Thread: | LOCKUP with XFS and NFS, Ajay Shekhawat |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |