xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images Athlon kernels

To: Chris Croswhite <ccroswhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images Athlon kernels
From: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:58:48 -0500
Cc: b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: (Personal)
References: <15033.39410.958392.383512@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3ABA9C42.407227B6@xxxxxxx> <3ABAF48A.3020908@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3ABAFEC7.37CC5D3B@xxxxxxxx> <3ABB96E7.9030803@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3ABB9A49.2080606@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx, b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images  Athlon kernels

Chris Croswhite wrote:
> Stupid me.  I just had to look for it (next time I will open my eyes).

We'll bitchslap you silly next time.  ;-PPP

BTW, I left my house this morning with my system building some
Athlon-optimized kernels for the PR 0.10-test2 release.  Let me know
if you are interested in them (I will be putting them up to my site
tonight).  For the .config files, all I did was diff the i686/Athlon
.configs in stock Wolverine and patch them against the i686 .config
in PR 0.10-test2 (to generate the Athlon .config).

-- TheBS

--
Bryan "TheBS" Smith          chat:thebs413 @AOL/MSN/Yahoo
Engineer      mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx,thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx
*********************************************************
"Never apply a Star Trek solution to a Babylon 5 problem"
                                    -- Nicholas C. Weaver

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>