| To: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bugreport - not really important |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:20:43 +0100 |
| Cc: | GCS <gcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <yq1bsqwr1dh.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 08:55:22AM -0500 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103200223470.2403-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yq1bsqwr1dh.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 08:55:22AM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Tom> what I am surprised about is that xfs did not replace the magic > Tom> number that tells the kernel and other tools what type of fs it > Tom> is. otherwise, the reiser tools do not verify this number (or > Tom> assume it could be corrupted). > > The problem here is that every fs puts its superblock a different > place. XFS has it on block 0, and reiserfs' is 64K from the beginning > of the device. This means it is impossible to install lilo on a XFS partition (as opposed to the MBR) -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mounting loop devices Thanx for the mkinitrd-3.0.5 patch!, Bryan-TheBS-Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mounting loop devices Thanx for the mkinitrd-3.0.5 patch!, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bugreport - not really important, Martin K. Petersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bugreport - not really important, Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |