I don't know if it's interesting but I have a well used XFS system running
for around 7 days now compiled with 2.95.2 so it seems OK on a standard
desktop PC at least...
PS. Does anyone on the list have any idea what in the changes since 9 days
ago might effect vmware? It ran perfectly on my box (except for the file
locking messages) until then. I thought it might be because I recompiled
the kernel with 2.95.2 but I went back to 2.91.66 and it still didn't
work. Anyway I seem to be able to live without exchange!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam Cioccarelli (B.E Mechanical) Adam.Cioccarelli@xxxxxxxxxx
Database Administrator Phone: +43 1 536 89 7725
Fax: +43 1 536 89 7719
ecetra Central European e-Finance AG Mobile:+43 664 181 4195
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> Timothy Ball wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to compile xfs on debian system. I'd rather not recompile the
> > compiler to do this, I notice that gcc wants to use gcc 2.91.66, where
> > as debian sid uses 2.95.3 would it be an issue to change the lines in
> > the top level Makefile to this:
>
> Yes that would work in fact if you look at the normal linux file
> that is how it is shipped.
>
>
> There have been several reports of 2.95.x working ... but it
> it still largely untested by anybody at SGI.
>
>
> >
>
> >
> >
> > --snip--snip--snip--
> > #comment out this line if compiling on RH 7.0
> > #CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc -V egcs-2.91.66
> > # AND uncomment the following line
> > CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
> > --snip--snip--snip--
> >
> > --timball
> >
> > --
> > Send mail with subject "send pgp key" for public key.
> > pub 1024R/CFF85605 1999-06-10 Timothy L. Ball <timball@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Key fingerprint = 8A 8E 64 D6 21 C0 90 29 9F D6 1E DC F8 18 CB CD
>
> --
> Russell Cattelan
> --
> Digital Elves inc. -- Currently on loan to SGI
> Linux XFS core developer.
>
>
|