| To: | Per Andreas Buer <per@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gcc 2.95.2 |
| From: | Vladimir Vukicevic <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 14 Mar 2001 15:56:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <ul6d7bkusy5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <gcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200103141615.f2EGFrZ13617@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ul6d7bkusy5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 14 Mar 2001 19:05:38 +0100, Per Andreas Buer wrote:
> Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I cannot speak for 2.95.2,
>
> I can.
>
> The kernel, compiled from CVS 2001-03-04, compiled nicely. Basic testing
> ( 42 processes doing "cp /tmp/1 /tmp/2" and "sync") for just a few
> seconds resulted in the attached crash. With egcs-2.91.66 this kernel
> worked flawlessly.
The gcc that is currently in Debian testing/unstable, gcc version 2.95.3
20010125 (prerelease), works fine -- two of us here have been running
XFS kernels built with this gcc for a while now...
- Vlad
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | REASSIGN 802021 - hang in _pagebuf_find_lockable_buffer, nb@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | CLOSE 802340 - kernel panic, lord@xxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: gcc 2.95.2, Per Andreas Buer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: gcc 2.95.2, Mark Hounschell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |