Bryan-TheBS-Smith wrote:
> cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > o RPMs have been generated on a 6.2 rpm 3.0.5 based system
> > rather than a Wolverine rpm 4.0.x based system.
> > This should provide better compatibility with RH 6.2 on up
> > and possibly other rpm based distributions.
>
> _Dumb_ question: Doesn't compiling on an older platform take issue
> (or not take advantage of) the newer GLibC and other capabilities?
This shouldn't change the interaction of the kernel and glibc,
unless there is a type change between the two versions.
But hey lets find out.... that is the reason these kernel are labeled
test.
>
>
> -- TheBS
>
> --
> Bryan "TheBS" Smith chat:thebs413 @AOL/MSN/Yahoo
> Engineer mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx,thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> *********************************************************
> "Never apply a Star Trek solution to a Babylon 5 problem"
> -- Nicholas C. Weaver
--
Russell Cattelan
cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
|