xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images It's for Wolverine (RH 7.0.91 aka

To: Chris Croswhite <ccroswhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images It's for Wolverine (RH 7.0.91 aka RH71 beta 2)
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 02:44:07 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: SmithConcepts/Personal
References: <15033.39410.958392.383512@lupo.thebarn.com> <3ABA9C42.407227B6@sgi.com> <3ABAF48A.3020908@get2chip.com>
Reply-to: b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx, thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images  It's for Wolverine (7.0.91
aka 7.1 beta 2)

Chris Croswhite wrote:
> I have tried the iso image.  However, everytime time I place
> in disc one of RH7.0, the installer indicates that the wrong disc
> is installed.  I have inserted disc 2 of RH7.0 also to no avail.
> Am I missing/using something here?

>From my understanding, the PR 0.10 releases are for RedHat
"Wolverine" aka 7.0.91 aka 7.1 beta 2.

-- TheBS

P.S.  7.0.90 aka 7.1 beta [1] was "Fisher"

-- 
Bryan "TheBS" Smith         chat:thebs413 @AOL/MSN/Yahoo
Engineer     mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx,thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx
********************************************************
"Linux will do for applications what the Internet did to
 networks" -- Sam Palmisano, IBM Chief Operating Officer

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>