xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bugreport - not really important

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bugreport - not really important
From: james rich <james.rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:54:12 -0700 (MST)
In-reply-to: <yq1g0g8p57l.fsf@jaguar.mkp.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 20 Mar 2001, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

> >>>>> "Andi" == Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> The problem here is that every fs puts its superblock a different
> >> place.  XFS has it on block 0, and reiserfs' is 64K from the
> >> beginning of the device.
> 
> Andi> This means it is impossible to install lilo on a XFS partition
> Andi> (as opposed to the MBR)
> 
> Yeah, well.  IRIX people put it there long time ago, and keeping the
> on-disk format the same is important to us.

I have to agree here - compatibilty with IRIX is far more important,
especially considering that LILO can go on the MBR.

James Rich
james.rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>