xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

TAKE - xfsdump specfile

from [Nathan Scott] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: TAKE - xfsdump specfile
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:27:11 +1100 (EST)
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Date:  Mon Mar 19 20:26:48 PST 2001
Workarea:  snort.melbourne.sgi.com:/diskb/build4/nathans/linux-xfs

The following file(s) were checked into:
  bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs


Modid:  2.4.x-xfs:slinx:90399a
cmd/xfsdump/build/rpm/xfsdump.spec.in - 1.4
        - we can no longer conflict with xfs-cmds as xfsprogs now Provides it,
          but we should be OK cos we Require xfsprogs anyway.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • TAKE - xfsdump specfile, Nathan Scott <=
Previous by Date:  Pre-production questions, Joshua Baker-LePain
Next by Date:  Re: mounting loop devices What other XFS patches are recommended?, Bryan J. Smith
Previous by Thread:  Pre-production questions, Joshua Baker-LePain
Next by Thread:  TAKE - qa, Nathan Scott
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]