| To: | b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx, thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Besides the patched kernel and commands, what else is needed? |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:38:31 -0600 |
| Cc: | Thomas Graichen <thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> of "Sun, 25 Feb 2001 08:25:00 EST." <3A9907AC.2ECF6D15@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Thomas Graichen wrote: > > basically nothing else is needed > > I'm kinda wondering what all is patched in the linux kernel tree > under CVS? I know both RedHat's 2.4.0/1 kernels come with a lot of > various patches to the stock kernel tree, and the SGI PR 0.9 2.4.0 > did as well. Have these been integrated into the CVS kernel (among > other patches?). [ I'm assuming so, along with other post-2.4.2 > patches that didn't make it in. ] Just for the record, the cvs tree contains a base kernel, plus those changes need to make xfs work, and some debugging / development tools (e.g. kdb). The rpms do have extra patches included which are not directly in the cvs tree. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS and Kernel 2.4.2, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New RPMs based on XFS CVS (Feb24) WORK! <- Hmmm, whole else besides SourceForge.NET?, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Besides the patched kernel and commands, what else is needed?, Bryan-TheBS-Smith |
| Next by Thread: | xfs hang, Rahul Jain |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |