| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH] |
| From: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Feb 2001 09:37:45 -0600 |
| Cc: | Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>, hhp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.32.0102071348290.11236-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A823EB1.10E12173@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3A8295DD.DC050118@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010208135337.A14856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:49:33AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote: > > Russell Cattelan wrote: > > > > > > "Hong H. Pham" wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. > > > I'll try to get this integrated in the next day or so. > > > > > This is good news.. > > Will this fix also be put into the "patch" package anytime soon? > > Don't be so optimistic -- there was at least another long long related bug > triggered in 2.95 by XFS. Yes our little shift bug is still lurking. I'll see if I can dig that one up also... no promises. > > > -Andi -- Russell Cattelan cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH], Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH], Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH], Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH], Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |