| To: | Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_shrinkfs ? |
| From: | Mike Gigante <mg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 3 Feb 2001 08:55:23 +1100 |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3A7AFED3.C48E2DC0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
xfs_fsr already exists right? It would appear that it could be modified without too much pain so that all the free space was contiguous at the end of the device. You'd also have to move the inodes from the back-end of the device (and hence change the inode numbers) but it would probably be a good start. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Gigante R&D Software Engineer mg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SGI Performance Tools Group, +61 3 9834 8233 Melbourne Australia V-Net: 524-8233 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | CVS 2.4.1-XFS module support broken?, J. Maynard Gelinas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_shrinkfs ?, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_shrinkfs ?, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_shrinkfs ?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |