[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kgcc now required ??

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kgcc now required ??
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:37:19 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3A86C9FC.EE891A9@sgi.com>; from sandeen@sgi.com on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 11:21:00AM -0600
References: <kszysiu@braxis.co.uk> <200102111503.f1BF3lH19265@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20010211180214.J16362@suse.de> <3A86C9FC.EE891A9@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 11:21:00AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > But can we at least get a decent work-around, that doesn't barf
> > if kgcc isn't available? It seems rather silly to assume gcc
> > is borken.
> As of 2.4.0, the official Makefile uses:
> CC :=$(shell if which $(CROSS_COMPILE)kgcc > /dev/null 2>&1; then echo
> $(CROSS_COMPILE)kgcc; else echo $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc; fi) -D__KERNEL__
> -I$(HPATH)

No - you seem to use some patched (-ac?) tree.


Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>