"Bryan J. Smith" wrote:
> Re: libxfs.h and the xfsprogs-devel package? <- Er, clarification
> ...
>
> Thomas Graichen wrote:
> > i am always using the cvs tree (or better my checked out copy of it
> > :-) ... the xfsprogs-devel rpm you get by going into the cmd/xfsprogs
> > dir and running "Makepgks verbose" (the same for the other rpms and
> > dirs)
>
> No, I'm familiar with that. I already built:
>
> acl-1.0.1-0.i386.rpm
> acl-devel-1.0.1-0.i386.rpm
> attr-1.0.1-0.i386.rpm
> attr-devel-1.0.1-0.i386.rpm
> dmapi-0.1.1-0.i386.rpm
> dmapi-devel-0.1.1-0.i386.rpm
> xfsdump-1.0.2-0.i386.rpm
> xfsprogs-1.1.2-0.i386.rpm
> xfsprogs-devel-1.1.2-0.i386.rpm
>
> What I was talking about was building _unified_ RPM akin to
> "xfs-cmds-1.0.5-1.i386.rpm" like in Pre-Release 0.9. That way I
> don't have to modify Anaconda to know that all those RPMs replace
> that one.
No modifications to anaconda are necessary.
added rpm's go in
RedHat/base/comps
and I believe xfsprogs obsolete xfs-cmds.
>
>
>
> As such, I just suggested putting a .spec file in the "cmd" CVS root
> so you can. I tried merging spec/makefiles in an attempt to create
> a new "xfs-cmds-*.i386.rpm" to no avail.
>
> -- TheBS
>
> --
> Bryan "TheBS" Smith, Engineer CONTACT INFO
> ***********************************************************
> Chat: thebs413 @ AOL/MSN/Yahoo (see http://Everybuddy.com)
> Email: mailto:thebs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Russell Cattelan
--
Digital Elves inc. -- Currently on loan to SGI
Linux XFS core developer.
|