xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Repeatable Panics with XFS and RAID1 (long)

To: Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Repeatable Panics with XFS and RAID1 (long)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:44:33 -0200 (BRST)
Cc: dcox@xxxxxxxxxx, Linux-XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3A943966.8F27E502@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan wrote:

> Danny wrote:
> 
> > Feb 20 12:51:38 dsc_proto_1 kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation
> > failed.
> 
> For those seeing __alloc_pages failing, can you please try this patch?
> With recent code changes, writepage() is used for flushing dirty pages,
> and this typically happens under memory pressure. So, doing anything
> expensive to allocate memory under these conditions is bad.

Ananth, 

I think allocating memory from the atomic queue (used mainly by in
interrupt context) to generate dirty data may cause problems.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>