| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mysterious dbench results |
| From: | Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 18 Feb 2001 17:51:04 GMT |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | innominate AG, Berlin, Germany |
| References: | <96nvna$goj$1@mate.bln.innominate.de> <news2mail-96o1pc$6nm$1@mate.bln.innominate.de> <96ot5r$ev3$1@mate.bln.innominate.de> |
| Reply-to: | Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.1-XFS (i686)) |
Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ok - now tested it on one machine once in smp and once in up mode
> and got the same results (very bad dbench results compared to
> ext2 or reiserfs) ... so it's not smp related - i'm right now
> updating the kernel and will post again - if the problem is
> still there ...
... and it is - so the question: anyone else seing this? - as said
dbench results are about 1/4th of ext2 results with the current
XFS tree on an ide disk system for smp and nosmp
t
--
thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
innominate AG
the linux architects
tel: +49-30-308806-13 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mysterious dbench results, Thomas Graichen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | libc6-dev changes (was Re: undefined reference on xfstools), Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mysterious dbench results, Thomas Graichen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mysterious dbench results, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |