| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd) |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:41:49 -0600 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Scott Smyth <SSmyth@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx '" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> of "Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:37:53 CST." <3A6C8C11.FB35C453@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:53:33PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote: > > > Steve Lord wrote: > > > > > > > > > Also Note: all of XFS's meta data writes when using LVM or MD devices > > > should be in 512byte chunks. > > > The switching sizes messeages is a bit weird as no size should be > > > anything > > > but 512 (meta data) or 4096 (file data) > > > > Just a random side comment... nothing really important. > > > > This means that XFS won't work on Linux/s390 because it has devices > > that do not physically support 512 byte blocks. We had fun fixing LVM there > > which used to rely on 512byte writes too. > > Ouch that one would be really hard to fix. This would require a bunch of > XFS work. :-( There is always read/modify/write at the driver level - you just have to make it atomic. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd), Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs and reiserfs, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd), Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd), Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |