| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd) |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:29:59 +0100 |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Scott Smyth <SSmyth@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx '" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3A6C81AD.2E66A128@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:53:33PM -0600 |
| References: | <200101221737.f0MHbDR12676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A6C81AD.2E66A128@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:53:33PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote: > Steve Lord wrote: > > > Also Note: all of XFS's meta data writes when using LVM or MD devices > should be in 512byte chunks. > The switching sizes messeages is a bit weird as no size should be > anything > but 512 (meta data) or 4096 (file data) Just a random side comment... nothing really important. This means that XFS won't work on Linux/s390 because it has devices that do not physically support 512 byte blocks. We had fun fixing LVM there which used to rely on 512byte writes too. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs and reiserfs, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd), Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd), Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd), Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |