xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd)

To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (fwd)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:29:59 +0100
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Scott Smyth <SSmyth@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx '" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3A6C81AD.2E66A128@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:53:33PM -0600
References: <200101221737.f0MHbDR12676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A6C81AD.2E66A128@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:53:33PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> Steve Lord wrote:
> 
> 
> Also Note: all of XFS's meta data writes when using LVM or MD devices 
> should be in 512byte chunks. 
> The switching sizes messeages is a bit weird as no size should be
> anything
> but 512 (meta data) or 4096 (file data)

Just a random side comment... nothing really important.

This means that XFS won't work on Linux/s390 because it has devices
that do not physically support 512 byte blocks. We had fun fixing LVM there 
which used to rely on 512byte writes too.


-Andi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>