xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs and reiserfs

To: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs and reiserfs
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:26:26 +0100
Cc: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3A6C7E32.F5854394@xxxxxxxxxx>; from markh@xxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:38:43PM -0500
References: <3A6C653C.B1983FE7@xxxxxxx> <3A6C7E32.F5854394@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:38:43PM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
It's really offtopic, but I have to correct obviously wrong statements.

>   While I'm here does anyone know anything about the 2 problems I
> descibed above.
> 
> 1. No LFS support in reiser  ( I know this ain't a reiser list. Sorry)

The reiserfs 3.6 that got merged into 2.4 supports files >2GB when you
let it convert the disk to a new disk format (this implies that 2.2 
reiserfs cannot read it anymore) 

> 2. On an XFS fs, doing an ls in a directory that has a file larger then
>    2+gb gives a message about to large to stat.

You need to recompile your ls with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 so that it uses
stat64(). AFAIK recent gnu fileutils will do that automagically when you 
configure/compile them with LFS aware glibc headers. 
Generally programs cannot access files >2GB unless they were recompiled
for LFS. 


-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>