xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs block size

To: "Davida, Joe" <Joe_Davida@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs block size
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:38:52 +0100
Cc: "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx '" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <09D1E9BD9C30D311919200A0C9DD5C2C025370A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Joe_Davida@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:45:17AM -0700
References: <09D1E9BD9C30D311919200A0C9DD5C2C025370A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:45:17AM -0700, Davida, Joe wrote:
>       On the web page you sited, I read:
> 
> "...We are using pages to cache metadata, pages are
> allocated one at a time, so each page sized chunk
> of memory usually is not adjacent in the address
> space to the page covering the next block of the
> disk."
> 
>       How does FreeBSD's UFS let you mkfs filesystems
>       with 16K FS pagesize? It is on same X86 architecture
>       as Linux!

But it is not Linux.  They do organize things differently.
(Linux UFS support larger blocks too, but it seems pretty b0rken
currently)

        Christoph
-- 
Whip me.  Beat me.  Make me maintain AIX.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>