| To: | Mearl Danner <jmdanner@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Compiling 2.4.0 with "gcc-2.96" |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:10:32 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Mearl Danner <jmdanner@xxxxxxxxxxx> of "Wed, 10 Jan 2001 08:14:12 CST." <EXECMAIL.1010110081412.A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> I've seen lots of discussion on the reiserfs list about "gcc-2.96". It appear > s > to be Red-Hat specific and should be avoided when compiling a stock kernel. I > > believe Red-Hat put kgcc (using SuSE so can't confirm) on for compatibility > reasons. gcc-2.95.2 is the latest on gnu.org's ftp site. 2.4.0 test kernels > would compile with it. I haven't tried the 2.4 yet. > I think you will find that 2.95.2 exhibits similar problems with XFS - there was also a bug in the code generated for XFS which stopped it from working. Since the rest of the kernel compiles with the newer compilers now, XFS should probably do so too. Steve p.s. Just in case people did not notice the email address - I am back at SGI again. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Compiling 2.4.0 with "gcc-2.96", Mearl Danner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - minor code cleanup, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Compiling 2.4.0 with "gcc-2.96", Mearl Danner |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - Export req_finished_io for SCSI as a module, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |