On Jan 2, 2:01am, Seth Mos wrote:
> Subject: Re: XFS and root shell
> > ...
> > this is really a bit of an unusual one ... the log format change
> > wasn't really corruption (which is what xfs_repair is out to
> > fix), it was a premeditated ondisk format change comparable to
> > ... i guess what i'm getting at
> > is that this example doesn't really have much to do with a rescue
> > disk after all...
> Ehm, if you have faulty RAM you still might want to have that rescue disk
yes, but thats a different example. ;-)
> though. Suppose that you have your root as xfs and something funky happens
> to your hardware?
yup, sure, you absolutely want a rescue disk in those cases.