| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pagebuf_prepare_write doesn't kmap the page |
| From: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:39:41 +0100 |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010131183712.A31126@gruyere.muc.suse.de>; from ak@suse.de on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:37:12PM +0100 |
| References: | <lord@sgi.com> <200101311643.f0VGhgR26778@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20010131183117.P508@suse.de> <20010131183712.A31126@gruyere.muc.suse.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Jan 31 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Dbench being slower in 2.4.1 vs 2.4.0 would be quite normal, and > > I wouldn't be alarmed if it's the only one disturbed by this. The > > easy way to get screamer dbench numbers is to completely ignore > > latency and finish one process I/O at the time only. > > This sounds like it would be interesting to modify dbench to log average > running times for individual processes. Then such latency changes could > be catched. Indeed, this would make it an even better disk benchmark. -- Jens Axboe |
| Previous by Date: | Re: pagebuf_prepare_write doesn't kmap the page, Jens Axboe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pagebuf_prepare_write doesn't kmap the page, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pagebuf_prepare_write doesn't kmap the page, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pagebuf_prepare_write doesn't kmap the page, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |