| To: | Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: grab_cache_page deadlock | was Re: set_buffer_dirty_uptodate |
| From: | Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Dec 2000 19:36:36 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012291358230.13063-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:59:05PM -0200 |
| References: | <20001229184444.H12791@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012291358230.13063-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:59:05PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > * We have to do this because something else might eat > * the memory kswapd frees for us and we need to be > * reliable. Note that we don't loop back for higher This looks bad design. Andrea |
| Previous by Date: | Re: grab_cache_page deadlock | was Re: set_buffer_dirty_uptodate, Marcelo Tosatti |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: grab_cache_page deadlock | was Re: set_buffer_dirty_uptodate, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: grab_cache_page deadlock | was Re: set_buffer_dirty_uptodate, Marcelo Tosatti |
| Next by Thread: | Re: grab_cache_page deadlock | was Re: set_buffer_dirty_uptodate, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |