xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - remove broken m_*devp

To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - remove broken m_*devp
From: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:30:46 +1100
Cc: kerler <kerler@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:57:41 MDT." <3A41A9E4.6C55ECCC@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:57:41 -0600, 
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>kerler wrote:
>
>> The SPECS/kernel-2.4.spec does not include ppc support after
>> kernel24-2.4.0-XFS_BETA_4.src.rpm is installed using rpm.
>> how can i use xfs on ppc? and can xfs-cmds-1.0.5-1.src.rpm be used on ppc?
>
>Your bet bet is to download the source directly from the cvs tree and do the
>compilation manually.
>(And quite frankly it's a lot easier and less frustrating than mucking with
>rpm)

A word of warning.  XFS has just upgraded to kernel 2.4.0-test13-pre3
with Linus's new Makefile format.  Not all architectures have upgraded
yet, so standard test13-pre3 (and therefore XFS) is not guaranteed to
compile at the moment.  Now is not a good time to try XFS on a new
arch, it would be better to wait until the Makefile changes have died
down.

The following architectures have _not_ converted to the new Makefiles
as of 2.4.0-test13-pre3.

  alpha (only math-emu is a problem)
  arm
  ia64
  m68k
  mips64
  mips
  parisc
  s390
  sh (Hitachi Super-H)

There are also some drivers that are not up to date, drivers/acorn/*,
drivers/s390/*, drivers/sgi/char, drivers/tc and drivers/zorro.  Also
there is no guarantee that the Makefiles that have been changed are
accurate, Linus did a bulk change and people are finding bugs.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>