[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patch: double freereq freeing

To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patch: double freereq freeing
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 02:19:58 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3A3C131A.1915BB39@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:12:58PM -0600
References: <20001210215635.E294@xxxxxxx> <3A33F25C.5E9FAB1C@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20001210222057.F294@xxxxxxx> <3A33F9C8.CD56A6CC@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20001211003152.O294@xxxxxxx> <3A34478B.BCCFB089@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20001211150432.C294@xxxxxxx> <3A355FE4.455ACC88@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20001217020302.C2061@xxxxxxx> <3A3C131A.1915BB39@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, Dec 16 2000, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> > Anything come of this? I haven't gotten any reports on how well it works.
> > I'm just assuming it's perfect, I know people will complain if it either
> > crashed or corrupts their data. Of course another option is that noone
> > has bothered trying it yet.
> >
> > In any case, I of course want to know if there are any problems at all
> > so we can get these fixed.
> Sorry nothing yet.
> Martin said he was going to run some test but I haven't heard from him.

Ok, this was also a message to the list saying 'if you've tried it, let
me know what happened'. I use the code myself too, not just for XFS but
as a test base for general kiobuf I/O.

> Our test team sometimes take a bit of time to get up to speed.
> I'll push on them a bit more monday.
> I've been a bit wrapped up with the merge up to test12.
> XFS and test12 seem to running smoothly finally,  I plan on checking it in
> either tonight or early tomorrow.

Great, I will test once it's comitted. 

* Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
* SuSE Labs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>