| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and test12 |
| From: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Dec 2000 10:34:54 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3A3AD8E0.F5F73A4B@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20001216091501.A23776@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:52:16PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote: > > Short update: > > Test12 has proven more difficult than expected. > > > > I've working around the fact that ll_rw_block is redefining the b_end_io > > callback. > > I now have the file system reading AND writing data again. > > You should use submit_bh() instead of ll_rw_block if you want to use > your own b_end_io. Yup... except sync_buffers calls ll_rw_block so all buffered writes were not going out to disk. > > > Christoph > > -- > Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS and test12, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch: double freereq freeing, Jens Axboe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and test12, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | NFS issues, Aaron Lehmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |