| To: | "Keith Owens" <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan" <ananth@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c |
| From: | "John Hawkes" <hawkes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:09:53 -0800 |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1700.976576626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "Keith Owens" <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ... > For consistency I will add frame pointers to the routines > that do not have it but recommend that frame pointers not be used. As it turns out, kernprof's mcount functionality claims to need frame pointers (to the point where the high-level kernel Makefile turns on CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER if CONFIG_MCOUNT is set), yet the current version 0.9 of the kernprof patch doesn't mimic what the kdb patch does in semaphore.c and insert the frame pointer instructions into the entry and exit of those selected asm routines. Unless someone tells me I'm wrong, I'll add those CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER instructions into the kernprof patch. John Hawkes |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - undo mods 80337a and 80332a, Ivan Rayner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE - build, Michael Pike |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c, Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |