| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch: double freereq freeing |
| From: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:20:57 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3A33F25C.5E9FAB1C@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:15:09PM -0600 |
| References: | <20001210215635.E294@xxxxxxx> <3A33F25C.5E9FAB1C@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, Dec 10 2000, Russell Cattelan wrote: > > This looks like a merge error. I sent this to Russell last week too, > > when investigating the recent kio/elevator problems. It's not critical, > > blkdev_release_request clears rq->q and thus it will not be freed > > twice. > > I have that one in the tree with the elevator patch. > I never got around to checking that particular fix in. Ah ok, so it didn't get completely lost :-) > BTW as far as your elevator patch goes do you know if > will be part of test12? I haven't submitted it, so test12 is unlikely. Next version perhaps, at least some parts of it. Depends on Linus and what he thinks at this point. In any way, I can merge it into the xfs tree if there's an interest. -- * Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx> * SuSE Labs |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch: double freereq freeing, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch: double freereq freeing, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch: double freereq freeing, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch: double freereq freeing, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |