xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patch: double freereq freeing

To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patch: double freereq freeing
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:20:57 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3A33F25C.5E9FAB1C@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:15:09PM -0600
References: <20001210215635.E294@xxxxxxx> <3A33F25C.5E9FAB1C@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Dec 10 2000, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> > This looks like a merge error. I sent this to Russell last week too,
> > when investigating the recent kio/elevator problems. It's not critical,
> > blkdev_release_request clears rq->q and thus it will not be freed
> > twice.
> 
> I have that one in the tree with the elevator patch.
> I never got around to checking that particular fix in.

Ah ok, so it didn't get completely lost :-)

> BTW as far as your elevator patch goes do you know if
> will be part of test12?

I haven't submitted it, so test12 is unlikely. Next version
perhaps, at least some parts of it. Depends on Linus and what
he thinks at this point.

In any way, I can merge it into the xfs tree if there's an interest.

-- 
* Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
* SuSE Labs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>