xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: uname

To: Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: uname
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:27:54 +0100
In-reply-to: <news2mail-905qsl$p11$5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 15:14 30-11-2000 +0000, Thomas Graichen wrote:
i found the idea of the uname 2.4.0-XFS-testxy a good idea to avoid
                                   ^^^^
conflicts with other kernels - looks like it got lost in the -test11
update - maybe we can put it back as default?

I already patched the Makefile to alter the kernel version.

putting -XFS-test11 in the extra version works.


t

--
thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
technical director                                       innominate AG
clustering & security                             the linux architects
tel: +49-30-308806-13   fax: -77             http://www.innominate.com

--
Seth
Has anybody seen my lightbulb?
I _really_ need some light here.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • uname, Thomas Graichen
    • Re: uname, Seth Mos <=
    • Re: uname, Russell Cattelan