| To: | Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: stress test on ppc |
| From: | "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:40:48 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Re: stress test on ppc" (Nov 29, 9:21am) |
| References: | <news2mail-8uecj0$i5e$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <10011141059.ZM128320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-8utlfv$8iu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <10011221244.ZM158790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-8vlq0n$hiu$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <10011261336.ZM166460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-8vt5ub$dhv$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <10011281048.ZM165042@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-9001u3$n0b$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <10011290940.ZM169800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-902hr6$307$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
hi Thomas, On Nov 29, 9:21am, Thomas Graichen wrote: > Subject: Re: stress test on ppc > "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ...looks like it happens pretty early > > ppc:/usr/src/xfs/cmd/xfs/mkfs # ./mkfs.xfs -f /dev/hda9 > meta-data=/dev/hda9 isize=256 agcount=8, agsize=49152 blks > data = bsize=4096 blocks=393216, imaxpct=25 > = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks, unwritten=0 > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 > log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=1200 > realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > ppc:/usr/src/xfs/cmd/xfs/mkfs # xfs_db -r -c sb -c p /dev/hda9|grep > blocksize > blocksize = 524288 > ppc:/usr/src/xfs/cmd/xfs/mkfs # > ok, so the problem is in either mkfs or xfs_db. after mkfs, run: # od -c -N 8 /dev/hda9 0000000 X F S B \0 \0 020 \0 0000012 you should see exactly that (the second 4 are the blocksize). if you do, its an xfs_db problem. if not, its a mkfs problem. lemme know. (at the same time, could you send the unfiltered "xfs_db -r -c sb -c p /dev/hda9" output also?) thanks. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: alpha again, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch for XFS on LVM and MD (RAID), Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: stress test on ppc, Thomas Graichen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: stress test on ppc, Thomas Graichen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |