xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: HEADS UP test11 merge.

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP test11 merge.
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 00:53:29 +0100
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9839.975194663@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; from kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 10:24:23AM +1100
References: <20001125204031.A31669@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9839.975194663@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 10:24:23AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 20:40:31 +0100, 
> Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I needed this patch from Russel King to load xfs again (without it the module
> >loading put zeroes where support_init should be, causing a crash) 
> >This was with modutils 2.3.14.
> 
> The fact that Documentation/Changes requires modutils 2.3.18 for
> kernels >= 2.4.0-test10 has obviously escaped everybody's notice.
> You should be using modutils 2.3.21 anyway, to fix the local root
> exploit.

The code in module.c was obviously wrong anyways though, otherwise
it would be rather useless to pass the structure size in. 

I also do not care about local root exploits on my test machines.


-Andi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>