| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs on a sparc64 |
| From: | Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 15 Nov 2000 15:35:25 GMT |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | innominate AG, Berlin, Germany |
| References: | <200011102123.PAA30359@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A127144.BFD8F5E6@xxxxxx> <yq1r94did3h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A1290F6.153AE744@xxxxxx> <yq1d7fxic2h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A12A5DE.105B9913@xxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.0-XFS-test10 (i686)) |
kris buggenhout <gast6@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Thnx ... fixed ...
> have a running xfs partition... 18 Gig ... filling it up with junk
> data...
> gonna do some tests ...
> stress tests etc...
do you also see the problems i saw on the alpha (see my other posting)
with mkfs, mount, umount, xfs_repair -> problems ? - would be good to
compare all the alpha and sparc64 problems to find out what is arch-
or compilerspecific and what depends on 64bit there ...
t
p.s.: if you don't find my posting - just mail me and i can forward
it to you
--
thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
technical director innominate AG
clustering & security the linux architects
tel: +49-30-308806-13 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs on a sparc64, kris buggenhout |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | type things on the alpha, Thomas Graichen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs on a sparc64, kris buggenhout |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs on a sparc64, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |