xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: stress test on ppc

To: nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Nathan Scott)
Subject: Re: stress test on ppc
From: tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Timothy Shimmin)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:55:46 +1100 (EDT)
Cc: graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Thomas Graichen), linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <10011141059.ZM128320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Nathan Scott" at Nov 14, 2000 10:59:49 AM
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> hi Thomas,
> 
> On Nov 13,  8:11am, Thomas Graichen wrote:
> > Subject: Re: stress test on ppc
> > ...
> > > ah - I think I see whats happened - there's two -ne tests like
> > > this & last time I only fixed one ... hopefully its fixed now
> > > (as of two minutes ago).
> > 
> > ok - reran the tests with your fixes - the current results (with all
> > the failed .out and .out.bad files) can be found at
> > 
> >   http://innominate.org/~graichen/projects/xfs/ppc/ppc.13-11-2000.tgz
> > 
> 
> 026/027/028/046/047 - a reoccurence of the dump/restore problems
> from Marcelo, Tim/Ivan?  or new ones?
Looks like a reoccurrence.
The dump/restore is not reading the inventory.

> also group "nobody" assumed to exist, but doesn't.  can we change
> the way the test works, Tim?  or exit cleanly if no "nobody" grp?
> or use numeric gids instead of named groups perhaps?
I'll use numeric gid instead (fixed in checkin).

--Tim

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>