| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - xfs_admin |
| From: | Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 8 Nov 2000 08:09:47 GMT |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | innominate AG, Berlin, Germany |
| References: | <200011080243.NAA05190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.0-XFS-test10 (i586)) |
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is only really going to be useful with a new mount binary, > which will then allow xfs filesystems to be mounted by-uuid or > by-label rather than by block special device (mount -U/-L). > I'm reliably informed [by Andreas :-)] that this will be in the > 2.10q util-linux package. If anyone wants the 2.10p+xfs patch, > just let me know & I'll post it here. maybe just put it onto the oss.sgi.com xfs ftp space - i would be interested in this - because it should nicely integrate into redhat 7.0 (mounting via label) i think - right? t -- thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx technical director innominate AG clustering & security the linux architects tel: +49-30-308806-13 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: stress test failures, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Your Achievements have Paid off #598F, Trent Dern |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE - xfs_admin, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE - xfs_admin, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |