xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: uname

To: Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: uname
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:57:06 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <news2mail-905qsl$p11$5@mate.bln.innominate.de>
Reply-to: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Graichen wrote:

> i found the idea of the uname 2.4.0-XFS-testxy a good idea to avoid
>                                    ^^^^
> conflicts with other kernels - looks like it got lost in the -test11
> update - maybe we can put it back as default?

Yup  thanks for reminding me, on my list of things todo.


>
>
> t
>
> --
> thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> technical director                                       innominate AG
> clustering & security                             the linux architects
> tel: +49-30-308806-13   fax: -77            http://www.innominate.com

--
Russell Cattelan
cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • uname, Thomas Graichen
    • Re: uname, Seth Mos
    • Re: uname, Russell Cattelan <=