xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: stress test on ppc

To: Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: stress test on ppc
From: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:59:49 -0400
In-reply-to: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@innominate.de> "Re: stress test on ppc" (Nov 13, 8:11am)
References: <news2mail-8uecj0$i5e$1@mate.bln.innominate.de> <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@innominate.de> <10011101103.ZM113097@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20001110094151.C333@ysabell> <10011110006.ZM127189@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <news2mail-8uo7od$4lt$1@mate.bln.innominate.de>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
hi Thomas,

On Nov 13,  8:11am, Thomas Graichen wrote:
> Subject: Re: stress test on ppc
> ...
> > ah - I think I see whats happened - there's two -ne tests like
> > this & last time I only fixed one ... hopefully its fixed now
> > (as of two minutes ago).
> 
> ok - reran the tests with your fixes - the current results (with all
> the failed .out and .out.bad files) can be found at
> 
>   http://innominate.org/~graichen/projects/xfs/ppc/ppc.13-11-2000.tgz
> 

ok, some progress - looks like the scratch device problem is
resolved and test 002 is fixed - great!

004 - this looks like a 32 bit number overflow in the xfs_db
"freesp" command, i'll need to investigate a bit more.

018 - ??? no idea - looks like theres a bunch of unexpected
records in the log for some reason?  bizarre.

020 - attribute syscall code not there in ppc?

026/027/028/046/047 - a reoccurence of the dump/restore problems
from Marcelo, Tim/Ivan?  or new ones?
also group "nobody" assumed to exist, but doesn't.  can we change
the way the test works, Tim?  or exit cleanly if no "nobody" grp?
or use numeric gids instead of named groups perhaps?

032 - hmmm... could be a problem in mount(8) code which we use
for mkfs.xfs so that it doesn't overwrite other filesystems -
can you see whether mount on ppc can autodetect (i.e. mount
without "-t" a filesystem created by mkfs.minix on ppc?  thanks)

033 - stress/src/devzero is not doing whats expected of it for
some reason? (the "Wrote 0.00Kb messages are very suspect, the
rest looks like consequential failure)


> too ... ah before i forget - test 041 seems to have hung the
> machine on ppc (thus it is not in here) - i'm right now
> rechecking this ... more about this later


cheers.

-- 
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>