| To: | Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS mount options? |
| From: | lord@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 03 Oct 2000 22:25:29 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Wed, 04 Oct 2000 12:02:09 +1100 |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Is there some reason that XFS ignores mount options it doesn't > know? Shouldn't it fail like ext2 does when it sees an unknown > option? > > I can fix it, but perhaps theres a reason? > I cannot think why not, Irix parses the options in user space and passes a structure into the kernel, it could have either behavior their, I think I have seen cases where it skipped bogus options, but they were cxfs ones. In the normal xfs case I suspect it will fail the mount on a parsing error. The linux kernel code should do the same. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PARTIAL TAKE 797165 uuid rationalization, Daniel Moore |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - fail on bad mount option, Daniel Moore |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS mount options?, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - xfs qa, Daniel Moore |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |