"Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:43:25PM -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote:
>> Date: Mon Oct 2 14:42:35 PDT 2000
>> Workarea: gibble.americas.sgi.com:/export/extra/x2.4-xfs-devel
>>
>> The following file(s) were checked into:
>> bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs
>>
>> Also changed extraversion to XFS-test8
>>
>> Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:75481a
>> linux/Makefile - 1.68
>> - Add compile line "kgcc" for RH 7.0
>> with comment explaining such.
> Hallo Russell,
> Could you please put somewhere into the XFS Beta module something like
> #if __GNUC__==2 && __GNUC_MINOR__==95
> #error "does not compile properly with gcc 2.95. get egcs 1.1."
> #endif
> This should save the users of distributions which come with
> 2.95 by default (SuSE, newer Debian, probably others) some grief and you
> many bug reports. Not all the world is RedHat.
maybe the same for 2.96 (redhat 7.0) too which as far as i remember
from here also has problems ...
t
p.s.: maybe we should also add an arch check there too - because on
ppc it seems to work (without any big testing) with 2.95 (and
i think there is no egcs precompiled available for this arch
in most distribs) ... i think alpha is about the same - but
on the other hand - who is playing with XFS on those arches :-)
--
thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
technical director innominate AG
clustering & security networking people
tel: +49.30.308806-13 fax: -77 http://innominate.de
|