xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS CVS development tree moving up to test8

To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS CVS development tree moving up to test8
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 08:49:53 -0500
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> of "Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:45:13 +0200." <20000929124513.A14471@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:44:39PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> > Because we have some unofficial system calls in the tree for xfs and
> > there are other new system calls in test8 I would recommend a command
> > rebuild after this (make clean; make). This really only affects extended
> > attribute code, but these calls are in some of the command binaries,
> > and some of the test programs will fail if this is not done.
> 
> Do you have plans to disable the system calls for the beta ?  (or allocate
> official slots for them) 
> 
> -Andi


The calls are in the beta images - and the caveat list says they will
change. Since nothing as yet is really using them I was not in a hurry
to get this sorted out - but it does make tree merges a pain. We do need
to find a solution, although I suspect it would only be a temporary one
given the fact that there is at least one other extended attribute
interface out there (http://acl.bestbits.at/). It has just not made it to
the top of the list yet.

Steve


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>