| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Which version of stat is used for the stress tests? |
| From: | "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:25:53 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <10009271105.ZM37848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 11:05:55AM -0400 |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20000926184220.A31300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx> <10009271105.ZM37848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
>> Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I believe most of us are using:
>
> $ rpm -q stat
> stat-1.5-12
>
> and not seeing any problems with it.
Yes, I can imagine that. Could you please note this somewhere?
There are two versions of stat(1) floating arround, one is included
with RH, one is included with Debian. Their output is slightly
different, thus making it difficult to get any useful information
from the stress test scripts. I've already patched a bunch of them,
but most of them *really* depend of the output format of the version
included with RH (which, I must note, does not have any license
whatsoever)
TIA,
Marcelo
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ADD 803065 - Data corruption while running rwtest, coreym@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - stress, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Which version of stat is used for the stress tests?, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | linux/fs/xfs/pseudo-inc/sys/types.h, Joseph I. Davida |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |