Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Sep 27, 1:15pm, Daniel Moore wrote:
> > Subject: More Caveats
> >
>
> One other thing may be worth mentioning - e2fsprogs-devel
> version 1.19 was released awhile ago. I had a look through
> the changelog at the time & there didn't seem to be any
> change that would affect the XFS commands at all (was one
> uuid related change but couldn't see a way it could affect
> xfs-cmds).
>
> It may be worthwhile making the rpm available along with
> the other xfs-cmds rpms/tarballs on oss, as was done for
> 1.18, for people building the tools themselves.
I had a discussion with Tom Duffy about this.
ProPack 1.4 does NOT include a version of e2fsprogs.
his take was that if anything that doesn't need upgrading and
is on the RH6.2 disc then is wasn't included in ProPack.
Note I did feel as a matter of convenience that it would be a good
idea for the XFS beta to install e2fsprogs; so it is included on the
iso image.
But I think Tom is right in that unless there is a clear need for
an upgraded version we shouldn't get into the upgrade for the
sake of upgrade business.
>
> Various versions can be found here...
> http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=e2fsprogs-devel
>
> cheers.
>
> --
> Nathan
--
Russell Cattelan
cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
|