xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: lilo on full XFS setup

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: lilo on full XFS setup
From: Jeff Hengesbach <jeffh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:14:32 -0400
Cc: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200009152006.PAA17867@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steve Lord wrote:
> 
> > I know the FAQ says xfs works well on /, but I have observed this:
> >
> > -On a setup using only xfs partitions, lilo will not install the mbr
> > correctly.  This installation has no ext2 partitions. Have to use a boot
> > disk(xfs kernel) to boot with.  Lilo does not complain when ran
> >
> > -On a setup where /boot is left ext2 and everything else xfs, works
> > fine. I just have /boot listed as (ro,defaults) in fstab to prevent its
> > corruption.  I also observed this during a xfs conversion - when after
> > dumping the ext2 system to the new xfs partitions then running lilo to
> > create an entry for the xfs setup while it is running on ext2 fs - But
> > if I reboot to xfs setup and run lilo - bad news, must use boot disk to
> > boot to ext2 setup and run lilo from there....
> >
> > Great work so far to the team.
> >
> > The kernel is the cvs version from 9/12 or 9/13. IDE drive - 450Mhz
> > K6-2.
> >
> > Jeff H
> 
> Yes, I have seen the same thing. I have had a couple of reports of successful
> lilo installation, but never achieved it myself.
> 
> In my case lilo gets to the LIL- state and hangs. I got as far as running
> strace on lilo and looking at the difference. Yhe
> 
> Are you using a complex lilo.conf file or just a single kernel entry?
> 
> Steve

During my attempts, I went from a lilo with 3 entries to just the 1 - no
different result wise though.  I experienced the LIL- as well.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>