| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Can any one explain this behavior? |
| From: | Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 14 Sep 2000 19:22:36 GMT |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | innominate AG, Berlin, Germany |
| References: | <200009140058.TAA08186@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200009140103.MAA26966@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.16-local (i586)) |
Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > William L Jones writes: > => > => > => If you create and mount a xfs file system then untar a few files and > direct > => ories in to it > => then run xfs_check you get errors. If you do a sync and then run > xfs_chec > => k on the > => file system you still get errors. If you umount and mount the file system > t > => hen > => the errors go away. > => > => I think this is has to do with the way the log transactions are handled > and > => that their is > => no problem. > => > => But I would like to know for sure! > This is definitely a FAQ. is added to the FAQ now .... t -- thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx technical director innominate AG clustering & security networking people tel: +49.30.308806-13 fax: -77 http://innominate.de |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE -, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | please mail, =C3=D6=C0=B6=BF=F8 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Can any one explain this behavior?, Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Can any one explain this behavior?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |